On 03/12/2012 12:13 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 12 March 2012 16:47, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> A very non-intrusive solution for allowing large theoretical limits. >> I've skimmed through the callers and it looks fine. >> >> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> >> >> Independently David's off_t patch or a variation thereof would still be >> needed to make use of the enlarged limit, wouldn't it? Image sizes >> remain int here. > > Yes. Also the arm_boot.c code is still passing things around in > int variables, which should be updated to use uint64_t. (The > arm_boot device tree code needs updating too, to check whether > the dtb is using 32 bit or 64 bit cell sizes for its RAM size). > I'm happy to put together a patch to do this at some point if > Mark doesn't already have one lined up.
I don't have one lined up for that. --Mark Langsdorf Calxeda, Inc.
