> On 08-Jan-2024, at 4:28 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 10:35, Ani Sinha <anisi...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add smilatency test script in the bits avocado tests from bios-bits. No
>> changes
>> have been made to the original test script. The test will be disabled in the
>> subsequent patch.
>>
>> CC: peter.mayd...@linaro.org
>> CC: cr...@redhat.com
>> CC: phi...@linaro.org
>> CC: bl...@redhat.com
>> CC: m...@redhat.com
>> CC: waine...@redhat.com
>> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <anisi...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .../acpi-bits/bits-tests/smilatency.py2 | 106 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tests/avocado/acpi-bits/bits-tests/smilatency.py2
>
> I'm confused -- why do we need to *add* the test? This
> test already exists somewhere,
That “somewhere" is within the bios-bits image. See
https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/acpi-bits.html
See "tests/avocado/acpi-bits/bits-tests” section.
> because we're running it.
> So why isn't the patch "disable that existing test"?
>
> thanks
> -- PMM