On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 10:42, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:33:49AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > That probably means we can never use even open source LLMs to generate > > > code for QEMU because while the source data is all open source it won't > > > necessarily be GPL compatible. > > > > I would probably wait until the dust settles before we start accepting > > LLM generated code. > > I think that's pretty much my take on what this policy is: > "say no for now; we can always come back later when the legal > situation seems clearer".
Absolutely. So I think we should not try and venture into terminology such as what is ai or try and promote legal copyright theories. ATM there's no good reason for someone who did not write the code to put their DCO on the code. If it is not clear who wrote the code because it was generated and not written then we don't want it. -- MST
