On 2023/11/23 12:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 3:49 PM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> wrote:Based-on: <20231029145033.592566-1-alex.ben...@linaro.org> ("[PATCH v2 00/19] Maintainer updates for testing, gdb, semihosting and plugins (pre-PR)") This series extracts fixes and refactorings that can be applied independently from "[PATCH v9 00/23] plugins: Allow to read registers". The patch "target/riscv: Move MISA limits to class" was replaced with patch "target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class" since I found instances may have different misa_ext_mask.What instances? Couldn't MXL have the same differences? > Alistair
Instances of subclasses of riscv-cpu. While misa_ext_mask are configurable for each instances with properties, the misa_mxl_max value is hardcoded for each classes and will not have such differences.
Regards, Akihiko Odaki
