On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 21:18, Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 11/14/23 12:55, Patrick Venture wrote: > > Avoids unaligned pointer issues. > > > > Reviewed-by: Chris Rauer <cra...@google.com> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Foley <pefo...@google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <vent...@google.com> > > --- > > system/memory.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/system/memory.c b/system/memory.c > > index 304fa843ea..02c97d5187 100644 > > --- a/system/memory.c > > +++ b/system/memory.c > > @@ -1343,16 +1343,16 @@ static uint64_t memory_region_ram_device_read(void > > *opaque, > > > > switch (size) { > > case 1: > > - data = *(uint8_t *)(mr->ram_block->host + addr); > > + memcpy(&data, mr->ram_block->host + addr, sizeof(uint8_t)); > > > This is incorrect, especially for big-endian hosts. > > You want to use "qemu/bswap.h", ld*_he_p(), st*_he_p().
More specifically, we have a ldn_he_p() and stn_he_p() that take the size in bytes of the data to read, so we should be able to replace the switch-on-size in these functions with a single call to the appropriate one of those. thanks -- PMM