On 2023/11/03 22:14, Yuri Benditovich wrote:


On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 11:55 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com <mailto:akihiko.od...@daynix.com>> wrote:

    On 2023/11/03 18:35, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
     >
     >
     > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 4:56 PM Akihiko Odaki
    <akihiko.od...@daynix.com <mailto:akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
     > <mailto:akihiko.od...@daynix.com
    <mailto:akihiko.od...@daynix.com>>> wrote:
     >
     >     On 2023/11/02 19:20, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
     >      >
     >      >
     >      > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 11:33 AM Michael S. Tsirkin
     >     <m...@redhat.com <mailto:m...@redhat.com>
    <mailto:m...@redhat.com <mailto:m...@redhat.com>>
     >      > <mailto:m...@redhat.com <mailto:m...@redhat.com>
    <mailto:m...@redhat.com <mailto:m...@redhat.com>>>> wrote:
     >      >
     >      >     On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 11:09:27AM +0200, Yuri
    Benditovich wrote:
     >      >      > Probably we mix two different patches in this
    discussion.
     >      >      > Focusing on the patch in the e-mail header:
     >      >      >
     >      >      > IMO it is not acceptable to fail QEMU run for one
    feature
     >     that we
     >      >     can't make
     >      >      > active when we silently drop all other features in
    such a
     >     case.
     >      >
     >      >     If the feature is off by default then it seems more
    reasonable
     >      >     and silent masking can be seen as a bug.
     >      >     Most virtio features are on by default this is why it's
     >      >     reasonable to mask them.
     >      >
     >      >
     >      > If we are talking about RSS: setting it initially off is the
     >     development
     >      > time decision.
     >      > When it will be completely stable there is no reason to
    keep it
     >     off by
     >      > default, so this is more a question of time and of a
    readiness of
     >     libvirt.
     >
     >     It is not ok to make "on" the default; that will enable RSS
    even when
     >     eBPF steering support is not present and can result in
    performance
     >     degradation.
     >
     >
     > Exactly as it is today - with vhost=on the host does not suggest RSS
     > without  eBPF.
     > I do not understand what you call "performance degradation", can you
     > describe the scenario?

    I was not clear, but I was talking about the case of vhost=off or peers
    other than tap (e.g., user). rss=on employs in-qemu RSS, which incurs
    overheads for such configurations.


So, vhost=off OR peers other than tap:

In the case of peers other than tap (IMO) we're not talking about performance at all. Backends like "user" (without vnet_hdr) do not support _many_ performance-oriented features. If RSS is somehow "supported" for such backends this is rather a misunderstanding (IMO again).

We do not need to ensure good performance when RSS is enabled by the guest for backends without eBPF steering program as you say. In-QEMU RSS is only useful for testing and not meant to improve the performance.

However, if you set rss=on, QEMU will advertise the availability of RSS feature. The guest will have no mean to know if it's implemented in a way not performance-wise so it may decide to use the feature to improve the performance, which can result in performance degradation. Therefore, it's better not to set rss=on for such backends.

Reply via email to