On 2 March 2012 11:35, Igor Mitsyanko <i.mitsya...@samsung.com> wrote: > Function name type_class_init() gave us a wrong impression of separation > of type's "class" and "object" entities initialization. Name type_initialize() > is more appropriate for type_class_init() function (considering what > operations > it performs). > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mitsyanko <i.mitsya...@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
The later patches in this series don't depend on this one, surely? Assuming that's correct, this patch should go in directly, not via arm-devs, and it shouldn't be in this series. thanks -- PMM
