On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:06:38PM +1100, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> Sorry about this.
> 
> First, libiscsi is a really good name for a general purpose
> multiplatform library, like libiscsi.
> Second,  a generic name like this is a horribly poor idea for a single
> distribution/ single use / obscure private library.

Yes, I agree it was a bad idea for the Fedora/RHEL admin to have done
this for iscsi-initiator-utils packaging. Now this exists though, the
library name & ABI has to be maintained in RHEL for back-compatibility,
so sadly we can't easily fix this. At the same time I really want to
include your iSCSI support in Fedora/RHEL.

So, IMHO, the simplest approach is to just avoid the namespace clash
by calling your library  libiscsiclient

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

Reply via email to