TARGET_F_*64 should be used instead of F_*64, because on 64-bit host systems F_GETLK == F_GETLK64(same for SETLK and SETLKW), so we cannot determinate if it's a long lock or not on a target 32-bit system. Patch in the attachment.
P.S. Please, review my privious patches, which I have added description recently. Or should I repost it?
diff -uNr qemu-0.9.0.cvs20070304.orig/linux-user/syscall.c
qemu-0.9.0.cvs20070304/linux-user/syscall.c
--- qemu-0.9.0.cvs20070304.orig/linux-user/syscall.c 2007-03-09 20:08:59
+0200
+++ qemu-0.9.0.cvs20070304/linux-user/syscall.c 2007-03-09 20:09:54 +0200
@@ -4063,7 +4063,7 @@
#endif
switch(arg2) {
- case F_GETLK64:
+ case TARGET_F_GETLK64:
ret = get_errno(fcntl(arg1, arg2, &fl));
if (ret == 0) {
#ifdef TARGET_ARM
@@ -4089,8 +4089,8 @@
}
break;
- case F_SETLK64:
- case F_SETLKW64:
+ case TARGET_F_SETLK64:
+ case TARGET_F_SETLKW64:
#ifdef TARGET_ARM
if (((CPUARMState *)cpu_env)->eabi) {
lock_user_struct(target_efl, arg3, 1);
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
