This is all very disturbing, Fabrice wrote an enhancement to qemu
that runs perfectly fine without KQEMU. Why should anyone have a problem
with what license he uses or terms he decides?
He wants a very reasonable price for the source if you want it, pay
for it, if you don't. Don't. He makes the module available to be used.
If you are worried about 'VIOLATING' the GPL don't use KQEMU.
There is no need for GPL consideration here. It's you're choice to use
it. He doesn't make you use it.
And for the record. Fabrice, you are amazing. My computing experience
has been greatly enhanced by your contributions. Thank you.
Mare
Auke Kok wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:20:54 +0200, "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrice is the owner of the KQEMU code, and he decides for his own
reasons to put the code under closed source license.
I'm sure that Fabrice knows and that I'm beating a dead horse, but this is
(strictly speaking, discussions pending ;^)) violating the linux kernel license
agreement.
Auke
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
!DSPAM:443a7e2e947657584822839!
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
