Am 24.05.2021 um 18:36 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > bs->sg is only true for character devices, but block devices can also > be used with scsi-block and scsi-generic. Unfortunately BLKSECTGET > returns bytes in an int for /dev/sgN devices, and sectors in a short > for block devices, so account for that in the code. > > The maximum transfer also need not be a power of 2 (for example I have > seen disks with 1280 KiB maximum transfer) so there's no need to pass > the result through pow2floor. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Looks like this is more or less a revert of Maxim's commit 867eccfe. If this is what we want, should this old commit be mentioned in one way or another in the commit message? Apparently the motivation for Maxim's patch was, if I'm reading the description correctly, that it affected non-sg cases by imposing unnecessary restrictions. I see that patch 1 changed the max_iov part so that it won't affect non-sg cases any more, but max_transfer could still be more restricted than necessary, no? For convenience, the bug report fixed with that patch is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647104 Are we really trying to describe different things (limits for SG_IO and for normal I/O) in one value with max_transfer, even though it could be two different numbers for the same block device? > diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c > index 59c889d5a7..e5ef006aee 100644 > --- a/block/file-posix.c > +++ b/block/file-posix.c > @@ -1149,22 +1149,27 @@ static void raw_reopen_abort(BDRVReopenState *state) > s->reopen_state = NULL; > } > > -static int sg_get_max_transfer_length(int fd) > +static int sg_get_max_transfer_length(int fd, struct stat *st) This is now a misnomer. Should we revert to the pre-867eccfe name hdev_get_max_transfer_length()? > { > #ifdef BLKSECTGET > - int max_bytes = 0; > - > - if (ioctl(fd, BLKSECTGET, &max_bytes) == 0) { > - return max_bytes; > + if (S_ISBLK(st->st_mode)) { > + unsigned short max_sectors = 0; > + if (ioctl(fd, BLKSECTGET, &max_sectors) == 0) { > + return max_sectors * 512; > + } > } else { > - return -errno; > + int max_bytes = 0; > + if (ioctl(fd, BLKSECTGET, &max_bytes) == 0) { > + return max_bytes; > + } > } > + return -errno; > #else > return -ENOSYS; > #endif > } > > -static int sg_get_max_segments(int fd) > +static int sg_get_max_segments(int fd, struct stat *st) Same for this one. > { > #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX > char buf[32]; > @@ -1173,15 +1178,9 @@ static int sg_get_max_segments(int fd) > int ret; > int sysfd = -1; > long max_segments; > - struct stat st; > - > - if (fstat(fd, &st)) { > - ret = -errno; > - goto out; > - } > > sysfspath = g_strdup_printf("/sys/dev/block/%u:%u/queue/max_segments", > - major(st.st_rdev), minor(st.st_rdev)); > + major(st->st_rdev), minor(st->st_rdev)); > sysfd = open(sysfspath, O_RDONLY); > if (sysfd == -1) { > ret = -errno; > @@ -1218,15 +1217,20 @@ out: > static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) > { > BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; > + struct stat st; > + > + if (fstat(s->fd, &st)) { > + return; Don't we want to set errp? Or do you intentionally ignore the error? > + } > > - if (bs->sg) { > - int ret = sg_get_max_transfer_length(s->fd); > + if (bs->sg || S_ISBLK(st.st_mode)) { > + int ret = sg_get_max_transfer_length(s->fd, &st); > > if (ret > 0 && ret <= BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES) { > - bs->bl.max_transfer = pow2floor(ret); > + bs->bl.max_transfer = ret; > } > > - ret = sg_get_max_segments(s->fd); > + ret = sg_get_max_segments(s->fd, &st); > if (ret > 0) { > bs->bl.max_iov = ret; > } Kevin
