On 05.02.20 12:20, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We are going to introduce bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty so that same
> variable may be used to store its return value and to be its parameter,
> so it would int64_t.
> 
> Similarly, we are going to refactor hbitmap_next_dirty_area to use
> hbitmap_next_dirty together with hbitmap_next_zero, therefore we want
> hbitmap_next_zero parameter type to be int64_t too.
> 
> So, for convenience update all parameters of *_next_zero and
> *_next_dirty_area to be int64_t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |  6 +++---
>  include/qemu/hbitmap.h       |  7 +++----
>  block/dirty-bitmap.c         |  6 +++---
>  nbd/server.c                 |  2 +-
>  tests/test-hbitmap.c         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  util/hbitmap.c               | 13 ++++++++-----
>  6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to