On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 01:58:02PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote: > This doesn't have any practical effect at the moment because the > values of BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE and > QCRYPTO_BLOCK_QCOW_SECTOR_SIZE are all the same (512 bytes), but > future encryption methods could have different requirements.
Yep, this matches what we do in block/crypto.c > > Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com> > --- > block/qcow2.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
