On 28.05.25 15:07, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
until the non-accessible area
Please write a bit more: what, why and how. What is the scenario when this change helps?
I think the client of snapshot-access, should not try to read/get-block-status from
"denied" areas?
Also, it's a lot more comfortable to read messages, starting from a full
sentence, not just continuing a sentence of subject. It's OK to repeat the
subject, may be in more detailed form.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadche...@virtuozzo.com>
---
block/copy-before-write.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/copy-before-write.c b/block/copy-before-write.c
index 7e074ad569..c5e6e1c112 100644
--- a/block/copy-before-write.c
+++ b/block/copy-before-write.c
@@ -207,10 +207,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn GRAPH_RDLOCK
cbw_co_flush(BlockDriverState *bs)
*/
the comment above the function should be updated to cover new logic
static BlockReq * coroutine_fn GRAPH_RDLOCK
cbw_snapshot_read_lock(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
- int64_t *pnum, BdrvChild **file)
+ int64_t *pnum, BdrvChild **file, bool query)
{
BDRVCopyBeforeWriteState *s = bs->opaque;
BlockReq *req = g_new(BlockReq, 1);
+ int64_t next_dirty;
bool done;
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&s->lock);
@@ -220,9 +221,13 @@ cbw_snapshot_read_lock(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t
offset, int64_t bytes,
return NULL;
}
- if (bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty(s->access_bitmap, offset, bytes) != -1) {
- g_free(req);
- return NULL;
+ next_dirty = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty(s->access_bitmap, offset, bytes);
+ if (next_dirty != -1) {
+ if (!query || next_dirty == offset) {
+ g_free(req);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ bytes = offset + bytes - next_dirty;
I don't follow. Shouldn't this be
bytes = next_dirty - offset
I.e., number of bytes from offset up to first "denied" byte.
}
done = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_status(s->done_bitmap, offset, bytes, pnum);
@@ -270,7 +275,8 @@ cbw_co_preadv_snapshot(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t
offset, int64_t bytes,
while (bytes) {
int64_t cur_bytes;
- req = cbw_snapshot_read_lock(bs, offset, bytes, &cur_bytes, &file);
+ req = cbw_snapshot_read_lock(bs, offset, bytes, &cur_bytes, &file,
+ false);
if (!req) {
return -EACCES;
}
@@ -302,7 +308,7 @@ cbw_co_snapshot_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t cur_bytes;
BdrvChild *child;
- req = cbw_snapshot_read_lock(bs, offset, bytes, &cur_bytes, &child);
+ req = cbw_snapshot_read_lock(bs, offset, bytes, &cur_bytes, &child, true);
if (!req) {
return -EACCES;
}
--
Best regards,
Vladimir