On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:13:44PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 25.03.2025 um 21:49 hat ~h0lyalg0rithm geschrieben:
> > From: Suraj Shirvankar <surajshirvan...@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Shirvankar <surajshirvan...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  util/fdmon-io_uring.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> As Stefan already mentioned, the commit message should say why we want
> to set this flag and why it is correct to do so.
> 
> Is there a reason why you change the io_uring_queue_init() call in
> util/fdmon-io_uring.c, but not the one in block/io_uring.c?

I only asked Suraj to look at util/fdmon-io_uring.c because I expect
block/io_uring.c's io_uring context to go away soon.

In my local io_uring branches I have prepared commits that replace the
io_uring context in block/io_uring.c with aio_add_sqe() calls that use
the AioContext's fdmon-io_uring.c io_uring context.

Stefan

> 
> If so, please document it in the commit message, too.
> 
> Kevin
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to