Hi,
> Due to security concerns inherent in the design of sprintf(3),
> it is highly recommended that you use snprintf(3) instead.
> - char response[40];
> + g_autofree char *response = NULL;
> - sprintf(response, "\033[%d;%dR",
> + response = g_strdup_printf("\033[%d;%dR",
Any specific reason why you don't go with the recommendation above?
While using g_strdup_printf() isn't wrong it allocates memory which
is not needed here because you can continue to use the stack buffer
this way:
snprintf(response, sizeof(response), ...);
take care,
Gerd
