On 2/12/22 13:23, Jonah Palmer wrote:
On 11/30/22 11:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi,
On 11/8/22 14:24, Jonah Palmer wrote:
From: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
This new command lists all the instances of VirtIODevices with
their canonical QOM path and name.
[Jonah: @virtio_list duplicates information that already exists in
the QOM composition tree. However, extracting necessary information
from this tree seems to be a bit convoluted.
Instead, we still create our own list of realized virtio devices
but use @qmp_qom_get with the device's canonical QOM path to confirm
that the device exists and is realized. If the device exists but
is actually not realized, then we remove it from our list (for
synchronicity to the QOM composition tree).
Also, the QMP command @x-query-virtio is redundant as @qom-list
and @qom-get are sufficient to search '/machine/' for realized
virtio devices. However, @x-query-virtio is much more convenient
in listing realized virtio devices.]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonah Palmer <jonah.pal...@oracle.com>
---
hw/virtio/meson.build | 2 ++
hw/virtio/virtio-stub.c | 14 ++++++++
hw/virtio/virtio.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 +
qapi/meson.build | 1 +
qapi/qapi-schema.json | 1 +
qapi/virtio.json | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c | 1 +
8 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 hw/virtio/virtio-stub.c
create mode 100644 qapi/virtio.json
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index 5d607aeaa0..bdfa82e9c0 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -13,12 +13,18 @@
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
#include "qapi/error.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h"
+#include "qapi/qapi-commands-virtio.h"
+#include "qapi/qapi-commands-qom.h"
+#include "qapi/qapi-visit-virtio.h"
+#include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h"
#include "cpu.h"
#include "trace.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "qemu/log.h"
#include "qemu/main-loop.h"
#include "qemu/module.h"
+#include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
#include "hw/virtio/virtio.h"
#include "migration/qemu-file-types.h"
#include "qemu/atomic.h"
@@ -29,6 +35,9 @@
#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
#include "standard-headers/linux/virtio_ids.h"
+/* QAPI list of realized VirtIODevices */
+static QTAILQ_HEAD(, VirtIODevice) virtio_list;
+
/*
* The alignment to use between consumer and producer parts of vring.
* x86 pagesize again. This is the default, used by transports like
PCI
@@ -3698,6 +3707,7 @@ static void virtio_device_realize(DeviceState
*dev, Error **errp)
vdev->listener.commit = virtio_memory_listener_commit;
vdev->listener.name = "virtio";
memory_listener_register(&vdev->listener, vdev->dma_as);
+ QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&virtio_list, vdev, next);
}
static void virtio_device_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
@@ -3712,6 +3722,7 @@ static void virtio_device_unrealize(DeviceState
*dev)
vdc->unrealize(dev);
}
+ QTAILQ_REMOVE(&virtio_list, vdev, next);
g_free(vdev->bus_name);
vdev->bus_name = NULL;
}
@@ -3885,6 +3896,8 @@ static void
virtio_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
vdc->stop_ioeventfd = virtio_device_stop_ioeventfd_impl;
vdc->legacy_features |= VIRTIO_LEGACY_FEATURES;
+
+ QTAILQ_INIT(&virtio_list);
}
bool virtio_device_ioeventfd_enabled(VirtIODevice *vdev)
@@ -3895,6 +3908,37 @@ bool
virtio_device_ioeventfd_enabled(VirtIODevice *vdev)
return virtio_bus_ioeventfd_enabled(vbus);
}
+VirtioInfoList *qmp_x_query_virtio(Error **errp)
+{
+ VirtioInfoList *list = NULL;
+ VirtioInfoList *node;
+ VirtIODevice *vdev;
+
+ QTAILQ_FOREACH(vdev, &virtio_list, next) {
+ DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(vdev);
+ Error *err = NULL;
+ QObject *obj = qmp_qom_get(dev->canonical_path, "realized",
&err);
+
+ if (err == NULL) {
+ GString *is_realized = qobject_to_json_pretty(obj, true);
+ /* virtio device is NOT realized, remove it from list */
Why not check dev->realized instead of calling qmp_qom_get() &
qobject_to_json_pretty()?
This check queries the QOM composition tree to check that the device actually
exists and is
realized. In other words, we just want to confirm with the QOM composition tree
for the device.
This was done to have some kind of synchronicity between @virtio_list and the
QOM composition
tree, since the list duplicates information that already exists in the tree.
This check was recommended in v10 and added in v11 of this patch series.
Thanks, I found Markus comments:
v10:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87ee6ogbiw....@dusky.pond.sub.org/
v11:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87ee4abtdu....@pond.sub.org/
Having the justification from v11 in the code rather than the commit
description could help.
+ if (!strncmp(is_realized->str, "false", 4)) {
+ QTAILQ_REMOVE(&virtio_list, vdev, next);
+ } else {
+ node = g_new0(VirtioInfoList, 1);
+ node->value = g_new(VirtioInfo, 1);
+ node->value->path = g_strdup(dev->canonical_path);
+ node->value->name = g_strdup(vdev->name);
+ QAPI_LIST_PREPEND(list, node->value);
+ }
+ g_string_free(is_realized, true);
+ }
+ qobject_unref(obj);
+ }
+
+ return list;
+}
