On 09/03/2016 09:13, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> > @@ -352,7 +352,9 @@ static void qed_start_need_check_timer(BDRVQEDState *s)
>> > static void qed_cancel_need_check_timer(BDRVQEDState *s)
>> > {
>> > trace_qed_cancel_need_check_timer(s);
>> > - timer_del(s->need_check_timer);
>> > + if (s->need_check_timer) {
>> > + timer_del(s->need_check_timer);
>> > + }
>> > }
> Not clear why this change is needed in this patch, but it is obviously not
> wrong. If this is to mask a bug, it at least deserves a comment.
>
> The other parts of the patch looks good to me.
I need to check. :)
Paolo
