Christian, hello.
Are there any plans to solve the problem of RUNPATH?
Or will everything remain as it is?
--
Pavel
26.10.2022 16:29, Карелин Павел пишет:
> Do I understand correctly that you use self-built QtC and you built
it using Qbs?
Yes. Moreover, Qbs is also self-built :))
> My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a
NEEDED entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect
dependencies as well.
Here says about the same:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47117443/dynamic-linking-with-rpath-not-working-under-ubuntu-17-10/47243544#47243544
> What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker uses RUNPATH and mine
uses RPATH by default. Could it be that distributions patch binutils
according to their preferences?
This problem began to arise in people when switching to Ubuntu 18.04
(I ran into it at Ubuntu 20.04 because I missed 18.04)
Apparently in Canonical decided that RUNPATH by default is more right.
--
Pavel
26.10.2022 14:38, Christian Kandeler via Qbs пишет:
On 10/26/22 13:24, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
I think, both RPATH and RUNPATH should work.
My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED
entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect
dependencies as well. What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker
uses RUNPATH and mine uses RPATH by default. Could it be that
distributions patch binutils according to their preferences?
Christian
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/qbs
