On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:36 PM Alessandro Dentella < sandro.dente...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:20:00PM +0200, Davide Muzzarelli wrote: > > Questo articolo è di fine 2016 ma ancora perfettamente valido > > > https://thehftguy.com/2016/11/01/docker-in-production-an-history-of-failure/ > > dall'articolo estraggo: > > It takes 5 years to make a good and stable software, Docker v1.0 is only > 28 > months old, it didn’t have time to mature. > > The hardware renewal cycle is 3 years, the distribution release cycle is > 18-36 > months. Docker didn’t exist in the previous cycle so systems couldn’t > consider > compatibility with it. To make matters worse, it depends on many > advanced system > internals that are relatively new and didn’t have time to mature either, > nor > reach the distributions. > > That could be a decent software in 5 years. Wait and see. > > Beh... quasi ci siamo, quindi è il caso di leggere articoli più attuali per > farsi un'idea... > Per esempio questo, giusto di due settimane fa: https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/blog/local-persistent-volumes-and-postgresql-usage-in-kubernetes/ Direi che possiamo passare oltre queste paure ;-) Ciao. Marco.
_______________________________________________ Python mailing list Python@lists.python.it https://lists.python.it/mailman/listinfo/python
