https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273122
--- Comment #6 from Charlie Li <vish...@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Mina Galić from comment #4)
It's not a mystery if you comment the URL of the upstream issue in the
${PATCHFILES} line. The commit also lists the original issue. If you are that
worried, create some backport issues upstream but immediately close them, that
way the commits stay even after any branch deletion.
(In reply to Joseph Mingrone from comment #5)
They do work by using the "ghost" commits.
(In reply to Joseph Mingrone from comment #5)
${PATCH_SITES}/${PATCHFILES} are applied before ${PATCHDIR} so the order
matters. Since what was accepted upstream, then backported, touches files that
${PATCHDIR} does, ${PATCHDIR} patches need to be regenerated. And since this
was accepted upstream, even just in trunk, they tacitly recommended that we
carry it ourselves for the backports, so ${PATCH_SITES}/${PATCHFILES} they go.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
