https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264136
--- Comment #2 from John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> --- By inspection, I conclude that "gssapi" is defined as a setuptools "extra", which is what should pull in the pyasn1 and gssapi optional dependencies. I would propose A) naming the new option after the upstream-defined extra (e.g. GSSAPI); and B) moving the devel/py-pyasn1 dependency under that option in addition to the security/py-gssapi dependency. As an aside, if base is built WITHOUT_KERBEROS, a GSSAPI feature can still be satisfied in general via ports using GSSAPI_HEIMDAL or GSSAPI_MIT. As far as I know, it is still up to the base builder to coordinate with the ports builder to ensure that the options each employs are compatible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
