I contacted Webfaction, who say they're looking at this now. I think they'll make a good case as they were trading at python-hosting.com back in the beginning<https://blog.webfaction.com/2010/11/a-look-at-our-python-setup/> .
Tom @tomviner <https://twitter.com/tomviner> On 14 February 2013 20:35, John Lee <j...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Tim Golden wrote: > > For those who don't follow other channels. >> >> http://pyfound.blogspot.co.uk/**2013/02/python-trademark-at-** >> risk-in-europe-we.html<http://pyfound.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/python-trademark-at-risk-in-europe-we.html> >> >> tl;dr - the PSF, to defend the use of "Python" in Europe, needs testimony >> and documentation to demonstrate that, for as long as possible, "Python" >> has meant the Python language in order to contest a commercial trademark >> application. >> > > ...particularly short letters from businesses, including businesses > outside of the UK (the latter according to this HN comment from someone who > claims to be a lawyer: > https://news.ycombinator.com/**item?id=5221407<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5221407> > ). > > Why is there no "throw it out as absurd within 10 minutes" process to save > everybody the expense and hassle? Including the company making the > application. Are trademark as messed up as patents? > > > John > > ______________________________**_________________ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-uk<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk> >
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
