Hey Barry, hey DPMT, we - the Debian Mailman3 maintainers - would like to backport the latest versions of flufl.i18n and flufl.lock from sid/testing to stretch-backports. They're required as dependencies for the Mailman3 packages to be backported.
Do you have any objections? What's the prefered workflow? We would create a new branch 'stretch-backports' in the packaging repos for that. Is that ok or do you prefer any other workflow for backports to stretch? Cheers jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
