Your message dated Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:36:22 +0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#833791: dh_sphinxdoc: Misleading error message “Sphinx 
documentation not found at […]”
has caused the Debian Bug report #833791,
regarding dh_sphinxdoc: Fails to recognise Sphinx-generated documentation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
833791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sphinx-common
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: normal

The ‘dh_sphinxdoc’ command is failing to detect Sphinx-generated
documentation:

=====
$ ls -l doc/_build/html
total 368
drwxr-xr-x 2 pbuilder pbuilder  4096 Aug  8 16:16 _sources
drwxr-xr-x 5 pbuilder pbuilder  4096 Aug  8 16:16 _static
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder  8076 Aug  8 16:16 api.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder  7163 Aug  8 16:16 api_coverage.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder  6671 Aug  8 16:16 api_coveragedata.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder  7569 Aug  8 16:16 api_plugin.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 13918 Aug  8 16:16 branch.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 83255 Aug  8 16:16 changes.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 34429 Aug  8 16:16 cmd.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 23177 Aug  8 16:16 config.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 16080 Aug  8 16:16 contributing.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 13477 Aug  8 16:16 excluding.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 11381 Aug  8 16:16 faq.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 10705 Aug  8 16:16 howitworks.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 12620 Aug  8 16:16 index.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 10426 Aug  8 16:16 install.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder  1264 Aug  8 16:16 objects.inv
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 10223 Aug  8 16:16 plugins.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder  5619 Aug  8 16:16 search.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 18782 Aug  8 16:16 searchindex.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 12502 Aug  8 16:16 source.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 11360 Aug  8 16:16 subprocess.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 pbuilder pbuilder 10219 Aug  8 16:16 trouble.html

$ dh_sphinxdoc doc/_build/html
dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found at doc/_build/html/
=====

My (Perl-illiterate) reading of the ‘/usr/bin/dh_sphinxdoc’ source
leads me to infer that the “found Sphinx documentation” check should
be satisfied by the presence of both the ‘searchindex.js’ and
‘search.html’ files. So I don't understand the failure, above.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_AU.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages sphinx-common depends on:
ii  libjs-sphinxdoc  1.4.5-1

Versions of packages sphinx-common recommends:
ii  python-sphinx  1.4.5-1

sphinx-common suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
 \     “Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather |
  `\                                             straps.” —Emo Philips |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 09:16:37PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > The error message should always say the correct directory name that
> > was actually inspected.
> >
> > If the directory does not exist, that should also be a separate error
> > message.
>
> This is all now fixed in Git.
>
> Re this bug: did you manage to solve your problem? Can I close it now?

I think all the issues are resolved now, so closing this.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

Reply via email to