On 29.11.2016 15:10, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:25:23 +0100 Julian Taylor > <jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 03.11.2016 20:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: >>>> Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However >>>> the >>>> package still failed to build on arm64. >>>> >>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pyzmq >>> >>> Hey Julian, do you have time to look at the failures in the >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pyzmq ? it looks like >>> upstream released 16.0.0 so it might worth a shot packaging it to see >>> if that solves them. thanks!! >>> >> >> I have packaged it though the tests are also unreliable on x86, still >> needs to be looked at. >> > > Could it be that zeromq3 4.2.0 (which is now in unstable) helps? > > It would be nice if this could be fixed before the soft freeze on > January 5. We are trying to get sagemath (currently not uploaded yet) to > migrate to testing before that date and it could become a problem to > have different versions of pyzmq (and zeromq3) in unstable and testing. >
No luck still hangs sometimes and I still had no time to properly look into it :/ Also the decision to not provide aligned even 4 byte aligned payload buffers in zmq 4.2 as indicated in #844479 is going to be a minefield in our arches without unaligned access ... _______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
