On 26-Nov-2014, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I'm sorry, but aren't we in the deep freeze phase of Jessie? What's > your plan exactly?
Thanks to those who asked for an explanation. In brief: nothing in this announcement asks anyone to interrupt the Jessie freeze. I've addressed this with a clarification followup <URL:https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/2014-November/022841.html>. > Also, could you give a brief sum-up of the API breakage between [ > <<0.9 and >=0.9 ]? Public classes in << 0.9 were re-named in 0.9. The attempt at providing backward compatibility is insufficient (the names that did refer to classes now refer to factory functions only). I will address the rest of your points in a post to ‘debian-python’, for those who are interested. -- \ “If I had known what it would be like to have it all... I might | `\ have been willing to settle for less.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily | _o__) Tomlin | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
