On 07.01.2014 21:38, Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 07.01.2014 21:23, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>> On mar, gen 07, 2014 at 09:10:35 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
>>> On 07.01.2014 21:02, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>>> caused by a minimum polling timeout of 0.5 seconds due to a bug in
>>> zeromqs timing src/clock.cpp:123 zmq::clock_t::rdtsc()
>>>
>>> still investigating a fix.
>>
>> Looking at the code:
>>
>>> #elif defined(__s390__)
>>> uint64_t tsc;
>>> asm("\tstck\t%0\n" : "=Q" (tsc) : : "cc");
>>> tsc >>= 12; /* convert to microseconds just to be
>>> consistent */
>>> return(tsc);
>>
>> Maybe the check needs to be "#elif defined(__s390__) || defined(__s390__)"?
>> If
>> that's the case, feel free to reassign to libzmq3.
>
>
> no its the conversion to "microsecond", the code is written to deal in
> pseudoclock cycles.
> see https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/811
>
this fix also seems to solve the test zeromq s390x failures :D
_______________________________________________
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
