A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Python 3000 turns into a let's-try-all-sorts-of-goofy-new-ideas > language, at least some of those ideas will turn out to have been > mistakes, and then we'll need a Python 3000++ to clean things up.
And I also think "we" will lose some developers in the community. Python is good because is flexible and it's tight to the need of people who write code for passion, work and educational purposes (that's another meaning of "multiple purposes language"). If Python turns to be only an educational language... it will definitely fail. -- Lawrence - http://www.oluyede.org/blog "Nothing is more dangerous than an idea if it's the only one you have" - E. A. Chartier -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
