Simon Forman wrote: > Carl J. Van Arsdall wrote: > > Hrmms, well, here's an interesting situation. So say we wanna catch > > most exceptions but we don't necessarily know what they are going to > > be. For example, I have a framework that executes modules (python > > functions), the framework wraps each function execution in a try/except > > block in order to compensate for what *might* happen. Upon coding the > > framework I really have no idea what types of problems these modules > > might have but I want to catch these errors so that I can clean up and > > exit gracefully, not only that but I want to dump the exception to log > > files so that we can attempt to fix it. So, I have the option of > > catching all standard exceptions and not list the ones I know I don't > > want to catch. But what about user defined exceptions? Do I then have > > to enforce policies on the system stating what types of exceptions can > > be raised? > > > > Is there a way in python to say, "hey, catch everything but these two"? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carl J. Van Arsdall > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Build and Release > > MontaVista Software > > > try: > # Do some stuff > except Exception, err: > if err not in (DontCatchMe1, DontCatchMe2): > # Handle err > > HTH, > ~Simon
Dang! not only did somebody else beat me to it, but my code is wrong and theirs correct. Sorry, ~Simon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
