On 07/07/06, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just did some testing between CherryPy's web server and lighttpd. > My test was very simple and I used ab.exe for this purpose. > CherryPy web server can serve about 140 simple request / second, while > lighttpd can handle around 400 concurrent requests. > > > You haven't really said much about your requirements though. Perhaps > > if you describe them in more detail (for example, what does "high > > performance" mean to you?) someone can make a more useful recommendation. > >
Karrigell has an async server, in standalone mode it won't be as fast as lighttpd but its simpler to use and code in than cherrypy. However, it can also work behind lighttpd, so you might get a good mix of server speed and fast development time. http://www.karrigell.com HTH :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
