Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote: > K.S.Sreeram wrote: >> The very fact that you can put a loop inside __metaclass__ may be reason >> enough for a one-off metaclass. > > Ah, it's not the loop but the access to the `dict`! You can write loops > at class level too but I haven't found a way to access `X`s `__dict__` > because `X` does not exist at this point.
You're right. I guess i wasn't clear in my previous post, but I was referring to 'the ability to process the dict (say, using loops)' > BTW, if that's what gangesmaster is after then it seem to work already. > Put ``(object)`` after ``X`` and return something, say 'a' and 'b', in the > getters and the example prints 'a' and 'b'. btw, the example seems to work even with old-style classes. Regards Sreeram
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
