[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Robert Hicks wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > .... why are people so concerned > > > that it's not changing? > > > > > > > I didn't mean to be irritating and I wasn't concerned about it not > > changing but I could probably have stated the question a little better. > > For some reason I thought it was a dead project so maybe "still being > > maintained" would be a better statement. I dunno. > > You're not the only one. Why do I keep seeing "gadfly...dead" > in the same sentence? > > What if it doesn't need maintenance? Does that make it dead? > No offense to you personally, you are just repeating what > everyone else has been saying for years for reasons that > totally escape me. Several times people have suggested that > gadfly be added to the python standard library and then the > question comes up... who will maintain it? And I answer I'll > maintain it if anyone finds serious problems with it and then > a few months later I hear that it was decided that gadfly was > a dead project. This has been going on since about '97. > It's irritating and tiresome. Sorry, I'm grumpy today. > Hey, that is okay. I know now never to ask that question. : D
Robert -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
