Joe Marshall wrote: > Andreas Rossberg wrote: > > > > Which is why this actually is a very bad example to chose for dynamic > > typing advocacy... ;-) > > Actually, this seems a *good* example. The problem seems to be that > you end up throwing the baby out with the bathwater: your static type > system stops catching the errors you want once you make it powerful > enough to express certain programs.
That is not the case: you can still express these programs, you just need to do an indirection through a datatype. - Andreas -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
