In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> Nick Maclaren wrote: |> |> > It's definitely worth fixing, but not as a high priority. Invoking a |> > file spuriously is potentially serious, with very low probability. |> |> the traceback printer is reading the file (using a very robust reader), |> it's not "invoking" it.
Boggle! Upon checking, that is indeed the case. All right - that drops the importance of the bug another notch. It's still an issue on systems with 'active' files, but that makes the chances of serious trouble even less likely than before. Regards, Nick Maclaren. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
