Nick Maclaren wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > |> > |> identical? you only applied @property to one of the methods, and then > you're > |> surprised that only one of the methods were turned into a property? > > I wasn't expecting EITHER to be turned INTO a property - I was expecting > both methods to be the same, but one would have non-default properties > attached to it.
That's another sign that property isn't intended to be used as a decorator. Normally, decorators wrap functions with other functions. property doesn't return a function but a descriptor object. Georg -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
