Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > | think that it is too relevant for the discussion at hand. Moreover, > | Harper talks about a relative concept of "C-safety". > > Then, I believe you missed the entire point.
I think the part of my reply you snipped addressed it well enough. Anyway, I can't believe that we actually need to argue about the fact that - for any *useful* and *practical* notion of safety - C is *not* a safe language. I refrain from continuing the discussion along this line, because *that* is *really* silly. - Andreas -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
