Dr.Ruud wrote: > Rob Thorpe schreef: > > > I would suggest that at least assembly should be referred to as > > "untyped". > > There are many different languages under the umbrella of "assembly", so > your suggestion is bound to be false.
Well yes, it is false, I know of several typed assemblers. But I mentioned that point elsewhere so I didn't repeat it. This thread is huge and I expect no-one will have read it all, so I will be more clear in future. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
