Rob Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another language which has *neither* latent ("dynamic") nor > manifest ("static") types is (was?) BLISS[1], in which, like > assembler, variables are "just" addresses[2], and values are > "just" a machine word of bits.
I'm unsure that it's correct to describe any language as having no latent typing, in the sense that's being used in this thread. It might be more correct to say "so specified latent typing" and/or "no latent typing beyond what is provided by the execution environment, including the CPU, virtual memory system, etc." as appropriate. I am aware of no hardware environment that really accepts all possible values for all possible operations without the potential of somehow signaling a type violation. -- Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer / Technical Trainer MindIQ Corporation -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list