Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think what this highlights is the fact that our existing terminology > is not up to the task of representing all the possible design > choices we could make. Some parts of dynamic vs. static > a mutually exclusive; some parts are orthogonal.
Really? I can see that in a strong enough static type system, many dynamic typing features would become unobservable and therefore would be pragmatically excluded from any probable implementations... but I don't see any other kind of mutual exclusion between the two. -- Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer / Technical Trainer MindIQ Corporation -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
