> Place all the code in a function. Even without psyco you might get
> somewhat better performances then. And I doubt psyco can optimise code
> that isn't in a function anyway.
>
> And lastly, most of the code is probably spend computing x**2 which is
> already optimised C code.
I've changed the code to include a class, method call, and function.
Now the Psyco code is quite a bit slower. Is this a valid way to test
Psyco's effects? When I run the following code I get this result:
without psyco = 0.96840101186
with psyco = 1.82430169197
with psyco = 0.855900680114 slower
The code:
import time
import psyco
class Test(object):
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
def foo(self):
return reduce(lambda x,y : x + y, list(range(0,self.value)))
def test(n):
l = [Test(i) for i in range(1, n)]
return [x.foo() for x in l]
n = 1000
t1 = time.clock()
l2 = test(n)
t2 = time.clock()
no_psyco = t2 - t1
psyco.full()
t1 = time.clock()
l2 = test(n)
t2 = time.clock()
with_psyco = t2 - t1
print 'without psyco = ',no_psyco
print 'with psyco = ',with_psyco
delta = (no_psyco - with_psyco)
if(delta > 0):
result = 'faster'
else:
result = 'slower'
print 'with psyco = ',abs(delta),result
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
