On Monday 19 June 2006 15:23, DarkBlue wrote: > prepare to shed lots of tears before > overcoming the initial disbelieve, that there is nothing > better available for python.
Ahem - not strictly true - that should read "there is nothing better for wxPython". Not being pedantic, it's just not true to say nothing better is available for python. Qtdesigner seems about on a par with the GUI design in Microsoft's Visual Studio software to me. Cheers, Ten -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
