> > (I was using *small* integers).
"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "small integers" is what the phrase "small integers" in the "small > integers" and "small integers" parts of my reply referred too, of course. But aren't "*small* integers" likely to be smaller than "small integers"? Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
