Serge Orlov wrote: > Ralph Butler wrote: >> Hi: >> >> I have searched the docs and google but have not totally figured >> out how to accomplish my task: On a linux box, I want to compile >> and link python so that it uses no shared libraries, but does support >> import of some "extra" modules. I have made a few attempts but >> with limited success. In particular, I have tried things like >> adding -static to the compiler options in the Makefile. >> >> At one point I managed to build a python that was close to what I >> wanted, e.g. when I ran "ldd python", it said: >> not a dynamic executable >> In that version, when I do some imports, e.g. sys, os, etc. they >> load fine. But, when I try to import some other modules, e.g. time, >> they are not found. I have tried similar procedures while also >> altering Modules/Setup.local (produced by configure) to contain: >> time timemodule.c # -lm # time operations and variables >> >> There has to be a simple, "elegant" way to accomplish this which I am >> simply overlooking. Any help would be appreciated. > > This has nothing to do with python. glibc doesn't support loading > shared libraries into statically linked executables. At least it didn't > support in 2002: > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-06/msg00079.html > Since it still doesn't work most likely it is still not supported, but > you may ask glibc developers what is the problem. >
I do not want to load them. I want to statically link the code for a module (e.g. time) directly into the statically linked executable. Sorry if that was not clear. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
