[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bottom Line: As I said before, I don't have a problem using VC2003 or > anything. It's by far the cheapest and easiest way just to buy VC2003 > and be done with it, than to fiddle around with GCC or anything. I just > think that Python should use the best technology available at the time > of release, which is VC2005 on Windows. But as I indicated before, of > course I do understand the argument that the release cycle has already > been planned and should not be changed, so we'll just live with it as > it is now.
Thanks for the confirmation; that's good enough for me. Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
