"Johann C. Rocholl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney schrieb: > > Simplify. Please don't attempt to write yet another set of license > > terms without expert legal assistance. You've already chosen the > > Expat license as being acceptable; use that, and you grant all the > > rest without even mentioning it. > > Sorry for my stubborn ignorance, and thank you for your patient > explanations.
No problems; if license proliferation can be reduced, it's worth spending some time to do so. > I think I finally got it: I'll put the bulk of my browsershots > project under the GNU GPL again, and the independent library parts > like png.py under the Expat License. Sounds quite workable. This has the effect that the work as a whole can be redistributed under the GNU GPL (since the Expat license allows this), and the library parts can be redistributed independently under just about any license. -- \ "As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we | `\ should be glad to serve others by any invention of ours." -- | _o__) Benjamin Franklin | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
