2006/6/10, SuperHik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Not necessarily vying for winner, but David's solution is highly > > specific as it doesn't do so well for something like > > > > aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa > > aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab > > Right. But that wasn't the question :p
The question was about elegance, and elegance is when someone asks "do something 4 times for 5 strings of length 3" and you solve it for "do something n times for m strings of length p" :) -- Roberto Bonvallet -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
