Anthony Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Howdy, I had the impression that pychecker caught and reported such
> dynamic syntactical errors.
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
>
> def add(i):
> i += 10
>
> status = 3
>
> if 1 == 1:
> statuss = 15
>
> add(status)
>
> =======================
>
> exalted sysfault$ pychecker foo.py
> Processing foo...
>
> Warnings...
>
> None
>
> =======================
>
> Hence the mispelling of status (statuss), which was done purposely to
> test if pychecker will acknowledge and report the error. Do i need to
> enable some type of pychecker option in order for it to pick up the
> error? I know that it is syntactically correct in python, however it's
> likely that 'status' is meant. Am i wishing that pychecker will
> replace a statically typed language mechanism?
>
I think you're asking a lot from pychecker.
kop = 1
koi = 2
if True:
koo = 3
What would you like pychecker to report?
--
rzed
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
