Tim Roberts a écrit : > Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Sion Arrowsmith a écrit : >> (snip) >>>"more flexible"? More convenient, yes. More powerful, maybe. But I >>>don't see more flexible. Everything print can to stdout.write() can >>>do. The reverse isn't true. eg (this appears to be a FAQ on this >>>group, although I can't find it in the FAQ): >>> >>>for x in range(10): >>> sys.stdout.write(str(x)) >>> >>>to print: >>> >>>0123456789 >> >>The reverse isn't true ??? >> >> print "".join(str(x) for x in range(10)) > > What he meant it that it is impossible to produce "0123456789" using 10 > separate print statements, while it IS possible with 10 separate writes.
why on earth would someone try to use 10 consecutive I/O operations on the same stream when it can be done with 1 ??? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
