John Machin wrote: > On 2/06/2006 8:36 AM, Paddy wrote: > > Oh the siren call of every new feature in the language! > enumerate() just to get a first-time test, and then botch it?? > > Read the following; the replacement version uses a simple old-fashioned > inelegant flag, works with an empty sequence, and doesn't depend on the > input being sliceable or indexable. > > HTH, > John >
Thanks, un-botchable John. What if the poster doesn't send a null list? What if the correct result for a null list is "spam"; or an exception? What if.... ... we toned down the language? Cheers, Pad. :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
